Which policing method relies on patrol for the apprehension deterrence and incapacitation of criminal offenders?

  • Access through your institution

Abstract

The capacity of police departments to solve crimes and apprehend offenders is low for many types of crime, particularly crimes of profit. This article reviews a variety of studies of police apprehension and hypothesizes that an important determinant of the ability of the police to apprehend criminals is information. The complete absence of information for many types of crime places fairly clear upper bounds on the ability of the police to effect solutions.

To discover whether these boundaries are high or low we analyzed data from the 1973 National Crime Panel about the types and amount of information potentially available to police through victim reports and patrol activities. The evidence suggests that if the police rely on information made readily available to them, they will never do much better than they are doing now. On the other hand, there appears to be more information available to bystanders and passing patrols than currently is being used, which suggests that surveillance strategies and improved police methods for eliciting, recording, and analyzing information supplied by victims and witnesses might increase the probability of solving crimes and making arrests. In light of this we review a few possibly helpful innovations suggested in the literature on police productivity and procedure.

References (61)

  • What happened to patrol operations in Kansas City

    Journal of criminal justice

    (1975)

  • Advisory Group on Productivity in Law Enforcement

    Opportunities for improving productivity in police services

    (1973)

  • M. Amir

    Patterns in forcible rape

    (1971)

  • G.E. Antunes et al.

    The impact of certainty and severity of punishment on levels of crime in American states: An extended analysis

    Journal of criminal law, criminology and police science

    (1973)

  • M. Argana

    Development of a national victimization survey

  • P.B. Bloch et al.

    Managing investigations: The Rochester system

    (1976)

  • R. Buckhout

    Eyewitness testimony

    Scientific American

    (1974)

  • F. Cannavale et al.

    Improving witness cooperation

    (1976)

  • Chicago Police Department

    Murder analysis, 1965–1969

    (1970)

  • J. Conklin et al.

    Burglary in a suburb

    Criminology

    (1973)

  • J. Conklin

    Robbery and the criminal justice system

    (1972)

  • L.A. Curtis

    Criminal violence: National patterns and behavior

    (1974)

  • E.M. Davis et al.

    An evaluation of the Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment

    Police Chief

    (1975)

  • I. Ehrlich

    The deterrent effect of capital punishment: A question of life and death

    American economic review

    (1975)

  • W.A. Eliot et al.

    Early warning robbery reduction projects: An assessment of performance

    (1975)

  • Farmer M. (1978). Personal...
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation

    Uniform Crime Report, 1976

    (1976)

  • F. Feeney

    The prevention and control of robbery

    (1973)

  • J. Folk

    Municipal detective systems: A quantitative approach

    (1971)

  • B. Forst et al.

    What happens after arrest? A court perspective of police operations in the District of Columbia

    (1977)

  • H. Garn et al.

    Models for indicator development: A framework for policy analysis

    (1976)

  • W. Gay et al.

    Improving patrol productivity:

  • B. Greenberg et al.

    Enhancement of the investigative function

  • B. Greenberg

    Felony investigation decision model: An analysis of investigative elements of information

    (1977)

  • P. Greenwood

    An analysis of the apprehension activities of the New York City Police Department

    (1970)

  • P.W. Greenwood et al.

    The criminal investigation process: Volume III: Observations and analysis

    (1975)

  • G. Hart

    Foreword

  • H.P. Hatry

    Wrestling with police crime control measurement

  • Institute for Defense Analysis

    Task force report: Science and technology, a report to the President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice

    (1967)

  • Cited by (52)

    Recommended articles (6)

    View full text

    Copyright © 1979 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

    What is the most effective method of patrol?

    The two most dominant methods of patrol are by automobile and by foot. Controversy exists concerning the use of one-person or two-person patrol cars. Studies indicate that one-person cars made more arrests, filed more formal crime reports, received fewer citizen complaints, and were less expensive.

    What is an example of proactive policing?

    Examples of proactive policing include an individual being stopped and searched by the law enforcement agent, increasing police patrols either by car or by foot, and police crackdowns.

    What is patrol strategy?

    It's about creating a sense of security, preventing crime, and identifying and solving community problems that go unnoticed without patrol—also known as problem-oriented policing. More and more law enforcement professionals are trying to align their police patrol strategies to crime prevention efforts in the community.

    What is problem

    Problem-oriented policing (POP) means diagnosing and solving problems that are increasing crime risks, usually in areas that are seeing comparatively high levels of crime (e.g., “hot spots”).

    Chủ đề