Can auditors be independent in fact yet not be perceived to be independent in appearance?

Amendments: Amending releases and related SEC approval orders

 .01         In all matters relating to the assignment, an independence in mental attitude is to be maintained by the auditor or auditors.

.02         The statement in the preceding paragraph requires that the auditor be independent; aside from being in public practice (as distinct from being in private practice), he must be without bias with respect to the client since otherwise he would lack that impartiality necessary for the dependability of his findings, however excellent his technical proficiency may be. However, independence does not imply the attitude of a prosecutor but rather a judicial impartiality that recognizes an obligation for fairness not only to management and owners of a business but also to creditors and those who may otherwise rely (in part, at least) upon the independent auditor's report, as in the case of prospective owners or creditors.

.03        It is of utmost importance to the profession that the general public maintain confidence in the independence of independent auditors. Public confidence would be impaired by evidence that independence was actually lacking, and it might also be impaired by the existence of circumstances which reasonable people might believe likely to influence independence. To be independent, the auditor must be intellectually honest; to be recognized as independent, he must be free from any obligation to or interest in the client, its management, or its owners. For example, an independent auditor auditing a company of which he was also a director might be intellectually honest, but it is unlikely that the public would accept him as independent since he would be in effect auditing decisions which he had a part in making. Likewise, an auditor with a substantial financial interest in a company might be unbiased in expressing his opinion on the financial statements of the company, but the public would be reluctant to believe that he was unbiased. Independent auditors should not only be independent in fact; they should avoid situations that may lead outsiders to doubt their independence.

.04        The profession has established, through the AICPA's Code of Professional Conduct, precepts to guard against the presumption of loss of independence. "Presumption" is stressed because the possession of intrinsic independence is a matter of personal quality rather than of rules that formulate certain objective tests. Insofar as these precepts have been incorporated in the profession's code, they have the force of professional law for the independent auditor.

.05        The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has also adopted requirements for independence of auditors who report on financial statements filed with it.

.06        The independent auditor should administer his practice within the spirit of these precepts and rules if he is to achieve a proper degree of independence in the conduct of his work.

.07        To emphasize independence from management, many corporations follow the practice of having the independent auditor appointed by the board of directors or elected by the stockholders.

29 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2011

Date Written: January 14, 2011

Abstract

Using non-accounting business students as a proxy for general public and senior accounting students as a proxy for accounting professionals, this study investigates the effect of ten different independent scenarios dealing with auditors’ appearance of independence on the chance that the auditor will not report a material misstatement in the financial statements. The results show that there are significant difference between accounting and non-accounting respondents when the auditor has a material direct financial interest in the client, when the auditor’s family members have a material direct financial interest in the client, when the auditor’s next of kin has a key position in the client, or when the auditor receives a more favorable loan term from a car dealer through the client arrangement. We did not find any differences between male and female respondents with respect to their perceptions of the ten scenarios in this study.

Keywords: Appearence of Independence, Accountants vs non-accountants

JEL Classification: M41

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Nouri, Hossein and Ahlawat, Sunita, Auditor Independence in Appearance: An Examination of Perception Differences between Accountants and Non-Accountants (January 14, 2011). CAAA Annual Conference 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1740645 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1740645

What is the difference between being independent in fact and being independent in appearance?

Independence in fact indicates that the auditor possesses an independent mindset when planning and executing an audit, and that the resulting audit report is unbiased. Independence in appearance indicates whether the auditor appears to be independent.

Why an auditor must be independent in mind and appearance?

The auditor should be independent from the client company, so that the audit opinion will not be influenced by any relationship between them. The auditors are expected to give an unbiased and honest professional opinion on the financial statements to the shareholders.

What is auditor independence in appearance?

Independence in appearance is the avoidance of circumstances that would cause a reasonable and informed third party, who has knowledge of all relevant information, including safeguards applied, to reasonably conclude that the integrity, objectivity or professional skepticism of a firm or member of the attest engagement ...

What determines whether or not an auditor is independent in fact?

To be independent, the auditor must be intellectually honest; to be recognized as independent, he must be free from any obligation to or interest in the client, its management, or its owners.