Over the lifespan consistency of individual differences in personality typically

In Brief

Show

July/August 2003, Vol 34, No. 7

Print version: page 14

2 min read

Comment:

While many may suspect that people's personalities are fixed in childhood, new research suggests that most people's personalities evolve throughout their lives.

Personality changes in men and women older than 30 were demonstrated in a study conducted at the University of California, Berkeley, and published recently in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 84, No. 5).

The researchers, who evaluated data from 132,515 adults, ages 21-60, looked at overall life span trends in the "Big Five" personality traits--conscientiousness, agreeableness, neuroticism, openness and extraversion.

"One of the major theories of personality asserts that personality traits are largely set by genetics, and, by consequence, changes in personality traits should slow as other functions of maturation slow," says lead researcher and psychologist Sanjay Srivastava, PhD. "We set out to test that."

What he and his team found contradicted long-held assumptions about when personalities are set. Conscientious-ness, a trait marked by organization and discipline, and linked to success at work and in relationships, was found to increase through the age ranges studied, with the most change occurring in a person's 20s. Agreeableness, a trait associated with being warm, generous and helpful, bucked the theory that personalities don't change after 30. On the contrary, people in the study showed the most change in agreeableness during their 30s and continued to improve through their 60s. This even happened among men, which debunks the concept of "grumpy old men," Srivastava says.

"The levels of change in these two traits seem to model what would make sense with adult roles," Srivastava says. "Conscientiousness grows as people mature and become better at managing their jobs and relationships, and agreeableness changes most in your 30s when you're raising a family and need to be nurturing."

Most of the observed personality changes were generally consistent across gender lines, except for neuroticism and extraversion, with young women scoring higher than young men. However, the gap between men and women diminished over time.

"When people talk about the 'Big Five,' neuroticism is probably the biggest sex difference--it's something that's been demonstrated before," Srivastava says. The difference in neuroticism is only apparent in youth and young adulthood and narrows as people age, Srivastava says.

Openness showed small declines in both men and women over time, a change that indicates less interest in forming new relationships, and may infer greater interest in spending time with a small group of well-known relatives and friends as people age, Srivastava says.

The large data set--collected over the Internet--allowed for the traits to be studied across many age groups, Srivastava says. Future research on the same data set will look into personality differences across regions, climates and population densities.

Psychologists Oliver P. John, PhD, and Samuel D. Gosling, PhD, and computer scientist Jeff Potter contributed to the research.

--K. KERSTING

Comment:

Over the lifespan consistency of individual differences in personality typically

Over the lifespan consistency of individual differences in personality typically

Abstract

Past research suggests that personality differs by age—older adults tend to be more conscientious, agreeable, and less neurotic than younger adults. However, most of these studies have used self-report measures of personality which may be influenced by people's motivations to appear socially desirable that also change over time. If these changing motivations affect the validity of personality measures, our understanding of age differences in personality may need to be revised. In the current study (N = 12,702), we examined age differences in implicit (i.e., IAT-based) and explicit (i.e., traditional self-report) measures of personality. Although we found some heterogeneity in the exact non-linear age patterns of personality across different measures, the age patterns were largely consistent across implicit and explicit measures of personality.

Section snippets

Age differences in implicit and explicit personality

There is now compelling evidence that personality changes across the lifespan—people tend to become more conscientious, agreeable, and less neurotic over time. Some of the earliest evidence for lifespan differences in personality came from large cross-sectional studies of age differences (Soto et al., 2010; Srivastava et al., 2003). However, most of these studies have used self-report measures of personality—or measures completed by a close other—which have historically been shown to, at least

The current study

In the current study, we assessed whether there was consistency in age differences across implicit (i.e., IAT-based) and explicit (i.e., traditional self-report) measures of personality. The preponderance of evidence suggests that personality differs by age, such that older adults are higher in agreeableness, conscientiousness, and emotional stability (age differences in extraversion and openness are less clear). However, most of this research has been conducted using self-report measures of

Participants and procedure

12,702 participants completed the Implicit Personality measure via the Project Implicit website between October 15 and November 28, 2010 (Nosek et al., 2002). These data had been previously published (Vianello et al., 2013) and made publicly available by the original authors, but information on age differences was not included in the prior report or otherwise published. The material from the original authors, as well as a more focused data set and syntax for the current project, are available

Results

Correlations between the primary study variables are presented in Table 1. Reproducing Vianello et al. (2013), correlations between traits measured implicitly and explicitly were relatively small (range: 0.13 to 0.29; Mr = 0.19). We also reproduced the small gender differences, such that women were higher in agreeableness and neuroticism, and the remaining traits showed some inconsistent gender differences. Age was associated with each trait in a consistent way across implicit and explicit

Discussion

In the current study, we assessed consistency in age differences across one implicit and two explicit measures of Big Five personality traits. Most research examining age differences has relied on explicit self-reports. We compared self-reports with implicit measures of personality that are ostensibly less prone to the social desirability biases implicated in self-reports. Although there was some variability in the specific pattern of age differences (e.g., linear or quadratic) and some traits

Conclusion

The current study examined consistency in implicit and explicit measures of personality across the lifespan. Because most studies of personality are based largely on self-reports, it was possible that their results may have been influenced by social desirability effects. To address this limitation, we examined age differences in personality in a large sample of people between the ages of 18 and 94 with both implicit and explicit measures of personality. While there were small differences found

Author note

Data and syntax for this study, as well as materials from the original developers of the implicit personality measure, are available at (https://osf.io/r58px/?view_only=220b658d7aa34f4e8d14858f427e64f8). This study was not pre-registered.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Mariah F. Purol: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. Jeewon Oh: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Meghan C. Abrom: Writing – original draft. Hana Bernard: Writing – original draft. Anna Forest: Writing – original draft. Seija D. Huhtala: Writing – original draft. Hyonjoon Kim: Writing – original draft. Haoyan Lin: Writing – original draft. Caitlin M. Meredith: Writing – original draft. Corrin S. Misak: Writing – original draft. Alex Mison:

References (79)

  • et al.

    Gender differences in implicit and explicit personality traits

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2013)

  • D.L. Paulhus

    Measurement and control of response bias

  • M.J. McDaniel et al.

    An assessment of the fakeability of self-report and implicit personality measures

    Journal of Research in Personality

    (2009)

  • R.R. McCrae

    Human nature and culture: A trait perspective

    Journal of Research in Personality

    (2004)

  • C.J. Hopwood et al.

    Realness is a core feature of authenticity

    Journal of Research in Personality

    (2021)

  • M. Grumm et al.

    Measuring Big-Five personality dimensions with the implicit association test – Implicit personality traits or self-esteem?

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2007)

  • F. Denzinger et al.

    Age and gender differences in implicit motives

    Journal of Research in Personality

    (2016)

  • W.J. Chopik

    Age differences in conscientiousness facets in the second half of life: Divergent associations with changes in physical health

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2016)

  • J. Allik et al.

    How people see others is different from how people see themselves: A replicable pattern across cultures

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2010)

  • J.B. Asendorpf et al.

    Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2002)

  • W. Bleidorn

    What accounts for personality maturation in early adulthood?

    Current Directions in Psychological Science

    (2015)

  • W. Bleidorn et al.

    Personality maturation around the world: A cross-cultural examination of social-investment theory

    Psychological Science

    (2013)

  • J.D. Brown

    Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments

    Social Cognition

    (1986)

  • W. Chan et al.

    Stereotypes of age differences in personality traits: Universal and accurate?

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2012)

  • S. Charles et al.

    Social and emotional aging

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (2010)

  • S.T. Charles et al.

    Now you see it, now you don't: Age differences in affective reactivity to social tensions

    Psychology and Aging

    (2009)

  • W.J. Chopik et al.

    Personality change across the life span: Insights from a cross-cultural, longitudinal study

    Journal of Personality

    (2018)

  • K. De Cuyper et al.

    Using indirect measurement tasks to assess the self–concept of personality: A systematic review and meta–analyses

    European Journal of Personality

    (2017)

  • M.B. Donnellan et al.

    Age differences in the big five across the life span: Evidence from two national samples

    Psychology and Aging

    (2008)

  • B. Egloff et al.

    Implicit anxiety measure predicts cardiovascular reactivity to an evaluated speaking task

    Emotion

    (2002)

  • K. Fiedler et al.

    Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the implicit association tests

    Basic and Applied Social Psychology

    (2005)

  • K. Fiedler et al.

    Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT)

    European Review of Social Psychology

    (2006)

  • B. Gawronski et al.

    Implicit measures in social and personality psychology

  • L.R. Goldberg

    A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models

  • A.G. Greenwald et al.

    Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1998)

  • A.G. Greenwald et al.

    Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2003)

  • A.G. Greenwald et al.

    Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2009)

  • A.-W. Harzing

    Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study

    International Journal of Cross Cultural Management

    (2006)

  • S.J. Heine et al.

    What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2002)

  • H. van Herk et al.

    Response styles in rating scales: Evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries

    Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

    (2004)

  • R. Hogan et al.

    A socioanalytic model of maturity

    Journal of Career Assessment

    (2004)

  • N.W. Hudson et al.

    Change goals robustly predict trait growth: A mega-analysis of a dozen intensive longitudinal studies examining volitional change

    Social Psychological and Personality Science

    (2020)

  • A. Jusepeitis et al.

    No elephant in the room: The incremental validity of implicit self-esteem measures

    Journal of Personality

    (2022)

  • K. Konstabel et al.

    Social desirability and consensual validity of personality traits

    European Journal of Personality

    (2006)

  • J. Krosnick

    Maximizing questionnaire quality

  • C.K. Lai et al.

    Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

    (2016)

  • K.E. Leahy et al.

    Heterogeneity in age differences in big five personality traits across the lifespan

    (2020)

  • C.E. Löckenhoff et al.

    Gender stereotypes of personality: Universal and accurate?

    Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

    (2014)

  • R. Loo et al.

    Confirmatory factor analyses of scores from full and short versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    (2004)

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text

    © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    How does personality change over the lifespan?

    Again and again, longitudinal studies have found similar results. Personality tends to get "better" over time. Psychologists call it "the maturity principle." People become more extraverted, emotionally stable, agreeable and conscientious as they grow older. Over the long haul, these changes are often pronounced.

    Is personality stable over the lifespan?

    Not necessarily. Many of us tend to think of personality as being fixed and unchangeable—the part of you that is inherently who you are. But according to a recent study, while our early personalities may provide a baseline, they are surprisingly malleable as we age.

    Does your personality change every 7 years?

    Personality Trait Change Is Normal So, your personality is quite likely to change within the next six years, especially if you are young. For example, chances are at least one in three that the feedback that you get for any given Big Five trait changes.

    At what age is personality stable?

    Personality traits such as conscientiousness and agreeableness are both stable and malleable from the age of 16 to 66, according to a new study based on fifty years of “Big Five Inventory” data gathered from 1960 to 2010.