I have a matrix with 94 nodes and label's file with 94 coordinates. However, when I try run Brainnet with commands I get this error: Error using horzcat Dimensions of matrices being concatenated are not consistent. Error in BrainNet_MapCfg (line 133) surf.sphere = [cell2mat(data(1)) cell2mat(data(2)) cell2mat(data(3)) cell2mat(data(4)) cell2mat(data(5))]; I have checked the number of nodes and egdes, but the number is correct (in my case 94). I've gotten the nodes coordinates with getcog and I checked the origin, size voxel in the image with the labels (I used MINDBOGGLE atlas) Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails. fati-aunread, Apr 5, 2018, 7:06:17 PM4/5/18 to YALMIP Hello Johan I have a problem about Dimensions of matrices, this problem is very strange for me because dimensions of parameter and controller are the same but still, there is this error : Error using vertcat Dimensions of matrices being concatenated are not consistent. Error in eliminatevariables (line 249) involved = [involved;find(m ~= fix(m) | m < 0)]; Error in optimizer/subsref (line 122) [self.model,keptvariables,infeasible] = eliminatevariables(self.model,self.parameters,thisData(:)); Error in cc_mpc2 (line 275) [sol,err] = controller{{P.x_k,alpha_tot(24*20+k:24*20+k+P.Hp-1,:),... could you please help me for solving this problem? Thanks Johan Löfbergunread, Apr 5, 2018, 7:46:32 PM4/5/18 to YALMIP The optimizer does not like models which have signomial parameterizations in models that are intended to be solved with a simple QP solver. Hence, your A matrix should not be parameterized in x, but you should define new variables beta and let these be parameters, and compute these this from x before you call the controller object. That will also lead to much less overhead in every controller call, since a lot of symbolic processing can be removed fati-aunread, Apr 5, 2018, 8:28:13 PM4/5/18 to YALMIP Dear Johan Thank you for quick answer. I change the matrix A of my model and now the model is not signomial but still, there is the same problem . Error using vertcat Dimensions of matrices being concatenated are not consistent. Error in cc_mpc2 (line 282) [sol,err] = controller{{P.x_k,... Thanks Johan Löfbergunread, Apr 5, 2018, 8:45:35 PM4/5/18 to YALMIP That's because the following code fails due to your commenting `>> {P.x_k, % alpha_tot(24*20+k:24*20+k+P.Hp-1,:),... alpha_tot(k:k+P.Hp-1,:),... D{mod(P.Hp+k-1,P.Hp)+1},... Dd{mod(P.Hp+k-1,P.Hp)+1},... bs{mod(P.Hp+k-1,P.Hp)+1},... devX{mod(P.Hp+k-1,P.Hp)+1} ` `} Error using vertcat Dimensions of matrices being concatenated are not consistent. ` ...and once you've fixed that it will still fail as the dimensions in the parameter list is not consistent with the data that you send Hello. I have a series of output A=2, B=3, C=4,D=5, E=[1;0.1;0.9]. I'm trying to put all of these output together as a row matrix, F. i.e F = [A B C D E]. But i keep getting the error 'Dimensions of matrices being concatenated are not consistent'. Is there a solution to this please? 3 Comments Direct link to this comment
Direct link to this comment
Dimensions of matrices being concatenated are not consistent. Function: gradientDescent FileName: C:\Users\oguns\Desktop\MATLAB Projects\gradientDescent.m LineNumber: 14 This is The error it says please... I dont seem to understand, cause in that specific line 14, the dimensions seems to be right.. m=97, and data is a 97x2 matrix.. can any one help please? Direct link to this comment
I can't run an image. Post your script - your m-file - in a NEW question (not here in Chiamaka's 3 year old question). In the meantime, try using a semicolon to concatenate the column vector onto your scalar X = [ones(m, 1); data(:, 1)]; This will stitch them one above the other, so if m=2: 1 1 d d d Using a comma tries to stitch the data column vector to the right of a single number, so if m is 2: 1 d 1 d d Which won't work because all columns must have the same number of rows. Sign in to comment. Accepted Answer
Because E is a column vector, not a row vector like you're building with all the rest of the numbers, you must transpose E: A=2 B=3 C=4 D=5 E=[1; 0.1; 0.9] F = [A, B, C, D, E'] so now F is a row vector. Or else use semicolons and don't transpose E: A=2 B=3 C=4 D=5 E=[1; 0.1; 0.9] F = [A; B; C; D; E] so now F is a column vector. 1 CommentDirect link to this comment
That worked. Thank you very much Sign in to comment. More Answers (2)
A=2 B=3 C=4 D=5 E=[1; 0.1; 0.9] F = [A, B, C, D, E'] 2 CommentsDirect link to this comment
Yes, exactly what I said in my first answer. Direct link to this comment
Sometimes inconsistence comes because your function def argu arrangments, and calling arg arrangements are not match. hope it will help too. Sign in to comment.
\>> A=['a' , 'b ';'c' ,'b'] Dimensions of matrices being concatenated are not consistent. Help 1 CommentDirect link to this comment
This is an error you have because you're trying to make a character array with 3 characters in the first row (a, b, and a space), and two in the second row (c and b). If you get rid of the space it will work: A=['a', 'b'; 'c', 'b'] A = 2×2 char array 'ab' 'cb' Sign in to comment. See AlsoCategoriesCommunity Treasure HuntFind the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you! Start Hunting! An Error Occurred Unable to complete the action because of changes made to the page. Reload the page to see its updated state. |
